New recipes

To Bovine or Not to Bovine

To Bovine or Not to Bovine


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

For a nation where milk is a common fixture in household fridges, a recent scientific publication relating high milk consumption to shorter life spans and increased rates of broken bones (a la osteoporosis) is the bearer of bad news.

But even as the study stimulated the precautionary before this particular study was released, cow’s milk has polarized many.

Photo by Flickr user Guy Montag

Got too much milk?

While mainstream knowledge touts cow’s milk as the holy grail of calcium containing foods, other opinions also give milk flak for the same reason. Though milk is promoted as one of the best ways for people, especially kids, to obtain calcium and other essential nutrients, the ideal amount of calcium one should consume is unclear.

Interspersed amongst the common knowledge that calcium is necessary for strong bones are claims that current recommendations for calcium intake may be too high. One study published in 2008 suggests that maintaining high calcium intake may actually have an adverse effect on bone health.

Photo by Sarah Joh

Environmental Considerations

In addition to questions regarding milk’s potential negative impacts on health, there are also those of milk’s environmental impacts. In terms of water use (a high-profile concern, especially considering California’s state of drought) cow’s milk proves to be a greater evil than some of it’s non-dairy cousins. The production of soymilk, for example, requires much less water than the production of cow’s milk.

Photo by Flickr user Ilja Klutman

The Rise of the Alt-Milks

As of recent years, plant-based alternative milks have gained increased fan bases, which are providing a significant force adding to the heightened scrutiny of cow’s milk. Almond milk is currently the milk in vogue. Whether lining shelves of grocery stores everywhere or standing in lieu of the soymilk that stands in lieu of cow’s milk in coffee shops, almond milk is the alternative that you can now find everywhere. For good reason too: it’s lower in sugar and has healthier fats. Read more about all the alternative milks here.

Photo by Sarah Joh

But, ultimately, whether or not we should cut out dairy from our diets depends on what we need in our diets in the first place. Because what we eat differs on an individual basis, the nutritional needs our foods need to satisfy also differ on an individual basis. If too-much or too-little calcium intake is a concern for you, note that many alternative milks come fortified with calcium and other nutrients to make its nutrient content comparable to that of cow’s milk. And regardless of calcium content, alternative milks often contain additives such as sugars and thickeners.

Photo by Flickr user Jonathan Lin

Variety arguably adds pizzazz to daily life, so having the luxury of choosing what kind of milk you want with your morning bowl of cereal is hardly anything to complain about. Yet, despite the scary nature of the news about cow’s milk, hold back from dumping that jug of milk down your drain and permanently switching from dairy to plant milks.

While science suggests that milk’s nutritional composition isn’t without its flaws, keep in mind that moderation is the key to health. Until additional research corroborates that drinking cow’s milk will be directly responsible for future broken bones, have your morning bowl of cereal and milk – and enjoy it too.

The post To Bovine or Not to Bovine appeared first on Spoon University.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Conde Nast’s Epicurious Announces it Won’t Publish Any More Beef Recipes Over Climate Concerns

Epicurious is the Conde Nast-owned recipe database that truly helped shape internet-based cooking resources as a true pioneer. It is in that same leading-edge role that it announced on Monday that it would no longer be publishing new recipes that include beef as an ingredient amid growing concerns over climate change.

The policy was adopted some time ago but was only announced this week In an article published Monday, the Editor of Epicurious explained the reasoning behind no more new beef recipes.

We believe that what we cook, and how we cook it, is a powerful action that anybody can take to fight climate change. Our mission at Epicurious is to provide cooking inspiration the dinner ideas we suggest often make their way from our kitchens to yours. Abstaining from beef means we can use our resources to focus our recipes on more climate-friendly foods. Our hope is that the more sustainable we make our coverage, the more sustainable American cooking will become.

Later, in the very same FAQ, Epicurious cites an expert on sustainability to explain why cutting beef consumption can have a real impact on the environment. “Cattle contribute to climate change in multiple ways,” says Sujatha Bergen of the Natural Resources Defense Council told Epicurious. “The first way involves the massive quantity of corn and soybeans grown to feed cattle. “It’s grown using pesticides and fertilizer, which are actually produced using fossil fuels…we apply them all over the corn and the soy that we use to feed cattle.”

It then continues the explainer:

The second issue occurs when the cows digest that feed: Via belching and flatulence (yes, in that order), cows release methane into the atmosphere. And methane is a particularly powerful climate polluter, Bergen notes. “It’s actually about 80 times more powerful as a climate polluter than carbon dioxide,” she says. “So that’s another place where [cows are] producing lots and lots of climate pollution.”

When that feed passes through the cow and eventually becomes manure, it remains problematic. And this is the third contribution cows make to climate change: Spread on fields or stored in lagoons, the manure releases both nitrous oxide and methane into the atmosphere. In fact, manure is responsible for about 12 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions from America’s agriculture sector.

Epicurious’s announcement comes at a time when beef consumption has become something of a wedge issue for conservative media eager to paint the Biden administration in the least favorable light, regardless if it is true or not.

Last weekend, Fox Business host and former Trump economic advisor Larry Kudlow suggested that President Joe Biden was going to limit the number of burgers Americans could consume with some sort of strange monthly meat mandate.” Despite the fact that isn’t true, it was picked up by numerous news and opinion programs on Fox News as though it were, which prompted at least one public correction.

It is true that the science community sees methane gas released by the millions of cows raised and slaughtered for a global beef demand does have a deleterious effect on the environment by hastening the greenhouse effect that causes global warming. It is also true that the Green New Deal seeks to limit the amount of beef consumed, but that is very far from any policy to be enacted, if ever.

If critics were to find something with which they could take issue here is that Epicurious isn’t really doing anything materially by pledging no new beef recipes. If they were more serious about limiting beef consumption they would delete the recipes, but seeing as they are not, it appears that they are more interested in signaling the virtue of their concern, and not acting as a catalyst for environmental change.


Watch the video: Ζεόλιθος σε χοίρους και βοοειδή στην Πρέβεζα (June 2022).


Comments:

  1. Nentres

    I join. I agree with told all above. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.

  2. Yvet

    I agree, this is a wonderful thing.

  3. Hillocke

    Certainly.

  4. Samushicage

    In my opinion, it is an interesting question, I will take part in discussion.



Write a message